Extraordinary rendition: Difference between revisions

Extraordinary rendition (view source)

Revision as of 18:02, 19 July 2021

46 bytes added , 19 July 2021

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{a|plainenglish|
 [[File:Moules.png|450px|thumb|center|Not a [[company]], yesterday.]]
-}}Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the ''UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of an Innocent and Much-Loved Language''.
+}}{{d|Extraordinary rendition|/ɪksˈtrɔːdnri/ /rɛnˈdɪʃən/|n}}<br>
-The most recent identified violation was [[Clifford Chance]] [[Luxembourg lawyer|Luxembourg]]’s ''non''-definition of “companies” in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[netting opinion]] (where else?) where our learned colleagues, having devoted some 700 words to the question of what Luxembourg companies ''are'', then embark on a further 150 musing, in excruciating detail, as to what they are ''not''.
+Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the UN convention against the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of language.
+{{icds}} are past masters, of courese, but the most recent identified violation was [[Clifford Chance]] [[Luxembourg lawyer|Luxembourg]]’s ''non''-definition of “[[Company|companies]]” in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[netting opinion]] (where else?).
+Here our learned colleagues, having already devoted hundreds of words to what Luxembourg companies ''are'', then embark on hundreds more musing, in excruciating detail, on what they are ''not''.
 It is a form of waterboarding just to read it:
@@ Line 38: / Line 42: @@
 (d) Puddings.}}
 {{sa}}
@@ Line 45: / Line 48: @@
 {{ref}}
-<references />