82,882
edits
Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd: Difference between revisions
Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd (view source)
Revision as of 19:07, 19 December 2020
, 19 December 2020Amwelladmin moved page Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited - Case Note to Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited - Case Note to Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{cn}}{{cite|Fearns|Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited|2007|EWHC|955(Ch)}} | {{cn}}{{cite|Fearns|Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited|2007|EWHC|955(Ch)}} | ||
Fearns and Anglo-Dutch sued each other. | |||
Fearns and Anglo-Dutch sued each other. In a very millennial outcome, they both won. Fearns was awarded £438,569 for breach of trademark. Anglo Dutch was awarded €594,696 for goods sold to Fearns which he didn't pay for. | |||
Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the {{tag|United Kingdom}}, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those [[European Union|garlic-munching continentals]].<ref>We can say things like this now we have a [[Red white and blue Brexit]], right?</ref> | Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the {{tag|United Kingdom}}, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those [[European Union|garlic-munching continentals]].<ref>We can say things like this now we have a [[Red white and blue Brexit]], right?</ref> | ||