Financial Collateral Regulations: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|security}}
{{anat|security|}}''Not to be confused with Ireland’s [[Financial Collateral Arrangement Regulations]].''<br>
The United Kingdom [[Financial Collateral Arrangement (No.2) Regulations 2003]] are the UK's implementation of the [[Financial Collateral Directive]], and were the subject of a long disquisition in the [[extended liens]] case.
The United Kingdom [[Financial Collateral Arrangement (No.2) Regulations 2003]] are the UK's implementation of the [[Financial Collateral Directive]], and were the subject of a long disquisition in the [[extended liens]] case.


Line 7: Line 7:
While a [[floating charge]] still offers less practical protection than a [[fixed charge]], where it qualifies as an [[security financial collateral arrangement]], the [[FCRs]] strengthen the lender’s position in certain respects.
While a [[floating charge]] still offers less practical protection than a [[fixed charge]], where it qualifies as an [[security financial collateral arrangement]], the [[FCRs]] strengthen the lender’s position in certain respects.
*'''Exemption from registration''': An SFCA is exempt from registration under the [[Companies Act 2006 (UK)|Companies Act 2006]]: Therefore, failure to register a an SFCA will not result in the [[floating charge]] being [[voidable preference|void]] against the borrower’s  creditors<ref>Reg 4(4) FCRs.</ref>.
*'''Exemption from registration''': An SFCA is exempt from registration under the [[Companies Act 2006 (UK)|Companies Act 2006]]: Therefore, failure to register a an SFCA will not result in the [[floating charge]] being [[voidable preference|void]] against the borrower’s  creditors<ref>Reg 4(4) FCRs.</ref>.
*'''Exemption from moratorium''': Generally, [[security interest|security interests]] cannot be enforced against an insolvent debtor without the consent of the administrator or the court. However, an SFCA is not exempt from this prohibition and can be enforced without delay<ref>Reg 8(1) FCRs.</ref>.
*'''Exemption from moratorium''': Generally, [[security interest|security interests]] cannot be enforced against an insolvent debtor without the consent of the administrator or the court. However, an SFCA is exempt from this prohibition and can be enforced without delay<ref>Reg 8(1) FCRs.</ref>.
*'''Better insolvency ranking''': Generally, a creditor’s claim on a secured asset will rank behind preferential creditors and the administrator’s costs and expenses. However, if it is an SFCA, the Lender’s claim will only rank behind prior fixed chargeholders’ claims<ref>Reg 8(1) and 10 FCRs.</ref>.
*'''Better insolvency ranking''': Generally, a creditor’s claim on a secured asset will rank behind preferential creditors and the administrator’s costs and expenses. However, if it is an SFCA, the Lender’s claim will only rank behind prior fixed chargeholders’ claims<ref>Reg 8(1) and 10 FCRs.</ref>.
*'''Exemption from disposal of secured assets''': Generally, an administrator could deal with assets subject to a [[floating charge]] as if the charge did not apply (though the secured party would maintain priority over the proceeds of the disposal). This does not apply for an SFCA<ref>Reg 8(1) FCRs.</ref>
*'''Exemption from disposal of secured assets''': Generally, an administrator could deal with assets subject to a [[floating charge]] as if the charge did not apply (though the secured party would maintain priority over the proceeds of the disposal). This does not apply for an SFCA<ref>Reg 8(1) FCRs.</ref>
Line 15: Line 15:
Generally [[floating charge|floating charges]] rank behind [[fixed charge]]s created before they [[crystallise]]. The FCRs do not change this. But conflicts of priority between fixed and floating charges are only likely to arise where the Borrower continues to hold and deal with the charged assets. It it does not, it can’t grant anyone else a fuixed charge either. therefore the presence of a third party custodian holding the assets in question (like, you know, a [[Triparty agent|tri-party agent]]) makes a big practical difference.
Generally [[floating charge|floating charges]] rank behind [[fixed charge]]s created before they [[crystallise]]. The FCRs do not change this. But conflicts of priority between fixed and floating charges are only likely to arise where the Borrower continues to hold and deal with the charged assets. It it does not, it can’t grant anyone else a fuixed charge either. therefore the presence of a third party custodian holding the assets in question (like, you know, a [[Triparty agent|tri-party agent]]) makes a big practical difference.


 
{{sa}}
 
{{seealso}}
*[[Fixed charge]]
*[[Fixed charge]]
*[[Floating charge]]
*[[Floating charge]]