First-loss: Difference between revisions

107 bytes added ,  20 October 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
}}''Not to be confused with a [[first-order derivative]].''
}}''Not to be confused with a [[first-order derivative]].''


Of potential claims against a given pool of assets, the “[[first-loss]]” is first one up against the wall when the revolution comes. This is to do with priority, preference and capital structure.  
Of potential claims against a given pool of assets, the “[[first-loss]]” is first one up against the wall when the revolution comes. This is to do with priority, preference and [[capital structure]].  


The first one for the early shower will be he whose claim is most ''[[subordinated]]''. That will be the common shareholder, if there is one, and if not (in, say, a CDO or a structured note of some sort) it will be the one bringing up the rear in the [[security waterfall]]. That will usually be the Noteholder or, if there are several [[tranche]]s of Notes, the most [[junior]], most deeply [[subordinated]], ones.  
The first one for the early shower will be he whose claim is most ''[[subordinated]]''. That will be the [[Shareholder|common shareholder]], if there is one, and if not (in, say, a [[CDO]] or a [[structured note]] of some sort) it will be the one bringing up the rear in the [[security waterfall]]. That will usually be the Noteholder or, if there are several [[tranche]]s of Notes, the most [[junior]], most deeply [[subordinated]], ones.  


It is only once the “[[first-loss]] piece” has been wiped out that the fellow holding the “[[second-loss]] piece” has anything to be worried about, much less the “[[super-senior]]” guy sitting at the top of the pile, usually with a bogus [[Ratings notches|triple-A rating]]. This was a great source of comfort, in the lead-up to the [[global financial crisis]], for those holding the most senior [[tranche]] of the [[CDO squared]] products that, well, precipitated it. It become a greater source of comfort, later, for everyone else with a taste for ''schadenfreude''.
It is only once the “[[first-loss]] piece” has been wiped out that the fellow holding the “[[second-loss]] piece” has anything to be worried about, much less the “[[super-senior]]” guy sitting at the top of the pile, usually clutching his a bogus [[Ratings notches|triple-A rating]] like a chewed cuddly rabbit with one ear that smells like sick.  
 
This was a great source of comfort, in the lead-up to the [[global financial crisis]], for those holding the most senior [[tranche]] of the [[CDO squared]] products that, well, precipitated it. It became an even greater source of comfort, later, for everyone else with a taste for ''schadenfreude''.


“The estimated loss on your average mortgage portfolio is about 5%,” these [[super-senior]] people would think, “and I have ''four'' [[tranche]]s below me, absorbing up to 40% of the losses of this one. So I’m, like, ''literally'' as safe as houses!”
“The estimated loss on your average mortgage portfolio is about 5%,” these [[super-senior]] people would think, “and I have ''four'' [[tranche]]s below me, absorbing up to 40% of the losses of this one. So I’m, like, ''literally'' as safe as houses!”


And so they were: as safe as the thousands of crappy, leaking, triple-mortgaged prefabs located on remote strips of recently-reclaimed Nevada desert that made up all most all of their portfolios.  
And so they were: as safe as the thousands of crappy, leaking, triple-mortgaged prefabs located on remote strips of recently-reclaimed Nevada desert that made up all most all of their portfolios.  


Don’t shed a tear: it was all for the best.
Don’t shed a tear: it was all for the best.