First law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

First law of worker entropy (view source)

Revision as of 18:29, 5 October 2020

20 bytes added , 5 October 2020

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :''A meeting with a definite '''justification''' has only an approximate probability of actually taking place, whereas the point of a meeting which is certain to go ahead can only be explained in a vague and probabilistic fashion, using words like “well...,” and “sort of” and “to be honest —”
-As, per Heisenberg, ''existence'' and ''justification'' cannot be simultaneously determined, it leads one to the conclusion that a meeting that one is presently attending, and that therefore definitely exists, must have only an indeterminate point, whereas the sort of meeting one would ''like'' to have — ones which would solve perennial problems, achieve useful things and do so in a way that was quick, simple, effective, and which imbued each attendee with a revitalised sense of vigour and purpose — these meetings cannot be certain to happen at all and, if they do happen, are likely to be highjacked for some ulterior, indeterminately consequential purpose.
+Since, per Heisenberg, ''existence'' and ''justification'' cannot be simultaneously determined, it leads to the inevitable conclusion that a meeting that one is presently attending — that is, one that definitely, right now, exists — can only have, at best, an indeterminate point, whereas the sort of meeting one would ''like'' to have — one which solves perennial problems, achieves useful things quickly, simply and effectively, and which imbues its attendee with a sense of vitality, vigour and purpose — those kinds of meetings cannot be certain to happen at all and, if they ''do'' happen, are likely to be highjacked for some ulterior, indeterminately consequential purpose.
 {{sa}}