82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Now, since when is transforming “is” to “ought” the philosopher’s problem? Isn’t the philosopher’s job done when we can look at this wonderful model derived from Darwin’s work, and say: Look, mum, no homunculus! No intelligent designer! No rules! | Now, since when is transforming “is” to “ought” the philosopher’s problem? Isn’t the philosopher’s job done when we can look at this wonderful model derived from Darwin’s work, and say: Look, mum, no homunculus! No intelligent designer! No rules! | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
{{br|From Bacteria to Bach and Back Again}} | *{{br|From Bacteria to Bach and Back Again}} | ||
{{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}} | *{{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}} | ||
*{{br|Consciousness Explained}} |