From Bacteria to Bach and Back Again: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 100: Line 100:


{{quote|There are so many different worlds  <br>
{{quote|There are so many different worlds  <br>
:So many different suns  <br>
So many different suns  <br>
:We have just one world  <br>
We have just one world  <br>
:But we live in different ones <br>
But we live in different ones <br>
::— Dire Straits, ''Brothers in Arms''.}}
:— Dire Straits, ''Brothers in Arms''.}}


I doubt Mark Knopfler was talking about literary theory. The modern world seems to be polarising. {{author|Daniel Dennett}}’s [[reductionist]] disposition is of a piece with that. But the conscious world each of us inhabits is an ambiguous, ambivalent, imaginarium of a place. Alternative accounts of it and the things in it are just additional tools in the box: we are free to use them, or not, as we wish. If we keep them as alternatives we will not have to philosophise with a hammer when the occasion calls for a soft cotton cloth.
I doubt Mark Knopfler was talking about literary theory. The modern world seems to be polarising. {{author|Daniel Dennett}}’s [[reductionist]] disposition is of a piece with that. But the conscious world each of us inhabits is an ambiguous, ambivalent, imaginarium of a place. Alternative accounts of it and the things in it are just additional tools in the box: we are free to use them, or not, as we wish. If we keep them as alternatives we will not have to philosophise with a hammer when the occasion calls for a soft cotton cloth.