82,882
edits
Frontier: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Frontiers are NOT a stable state, and soon enough those with the foresight and wherewithal to exploit the new tools will effect barriers and establish economic dominance in a way that excludes new entrants, or aligns the new platform to the interests of these early adopters. They will get progressively more organised,process focussed and standardised, and hence less flexible, to the point where that cannot react to future shocks (which seemed to cannibalise their existing model). | Frontiers are NOT a stable state, and soon enough those with the foresight and wherewithal to exploit the new tools will effect barriers and establish economic dominance in a way that excludes new entrants, or aligns the new platform to the interests of these early adopters. They will get progressively more organised,process focussed and standardised, and hence less flexible, to the point where that cannot react to future shocks (which seemed to cannibalise their existing model). | ||
Cf [[Roger Martin]] {{br|The Design of Business}} and the line cycles of a business of [[ | Cf [[Roger Martin]] {{br|The Design of Business}} and the line cycles of a business of [[mystery]], [[heuristic]] and [[algorithm]]. | ||
The frontier is the point at which the risk of outright failure is highest, but conversely the opportunity should the the projects not fail, is greatest. One that can only be a Steve Jobs Bill gates koma Mark Zuckerberg Lennon and McCartney, Elvis if one is there at the frontier. | |||
Popular recent frontiers | Popular recent frontiers | ||