Grand unifying theory: Difference between revisions

Grand unifying theory (view source)

920 bytes added , 6 March 2021

no edit summary

82,891

edits

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 consider also how easy it is to get a legal opinion or certificate of compliance or ruling. If the question is is quotes did you do the right thing" is any law firm going to write that opinion question mark and more than the point, should they?
+===The indeterminacy of meaning as fundamental to that===
+If truth is a property of a sentence and a sentence is a fundamentally indeterminate thing, whose meaning lives not between author and page but page and reader, this puts the current climate of study outrage, particularly about historical statements, in some perspective.
+===Canard that with data you don't need
+expertise or even comprehension===
+the revolutionary idea of big data is that with algorithmic processing the need for comprehension disappears. But an algorithm is simply a process of quickly matching data points to to an existing narrative. an algorithm might refine a narrative or falsify one, or even provide material by which and you narrative can be constructed, but cannot construct a new narrative because creating a narrative is a necessarily creative linguistic axe and that is precisely the faculty that algorithms have done away with.