82,891
edits
Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc: Difference between revisions
Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc (view source)
Revision as of 13:15, 18 May 2016
, 18 May 2016no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Schoolboy error no.1 by NatWest was to agree a notice deadline which expired when Greenclose was highly likelihood to be out of the office. But that's as may be. | Schoolboy error no.1 by NatWest was to agree a notice deadline which expired when Greenclose was highly likelihood to be out of the office. But that's as may be. | ||
{{Box | {{Box|'''Learning Number 1''': Don't set an option expiry period that obliges you to serve notice in the Grundle.}} | ||
Error no. 2 - less of a schoolboy one, in this reviewer's opinion, was to assume that an email - being, after all, an '''electronic''' mail sent over a computer '''system''' (so sayeth [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email Wikipedia]) fell within the meaning of an "electronic messaging system". | Error no. 2 - less of a schoolboy one, in this reviewer's opinion, was to assume that an email - being, after all, an '''electronic''' mail sent over a computer '''system''' (so sayeth [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email Wikipedia]) fell within the meaning of an "electronic messaging system". | ||