Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc: Difference between revisions

Line 26: Line 26:
Error no. 2 – less of a schoolboy one, in this reviewer’s opinion – was to presume that an [[email]], being, after all, an '''electronic''' mail '''message''' sent over a computer '''system''' (so sayeth [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email Wikipedia]) fell within the meaning of an “[[electronic messaging system]]”.
Error no. 2 – less of a schoolboy one, in this reviewer’s opinion – was to presume that an [[email]], being, after all, an '''electronic''' mail '''message''' sent over a computer '''system''' (so sayeth [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email Wikipedia]) fell within the meaning of an “[[electronic messaging system]]”.


===[[Email]] is not an [[electronic messaging system]]?===
===Wait - [[email]] is ''not'' an [[electronic messaging system]]?===
This was the hinge point of the case: does [[email]] count as an [[electronic messaging system]] under {{1992ma}}? No, thought Andrews J. because:
This was the hinge point of the case: does [[email]] count as an [[electronic messaging system]] under {{1992ma}}? No, thought Andrews J. because: