Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc: Difference between revisions

Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc (view source)

34 bytes added , 10 July 2019

no edit summary

82,891

edits

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==NatWest’s errors==
-Schoolboy error no.1 was to have notice deadline which expired during the Christmas holidays. But that’s as may be. (In fairness, it’s not ''that'' outlandish to expect a hotel to be open in the Christmas holidays.) But  as a rule of thumb it’s best not to have your options expire at Christmas. Anyway, the learning here is this: ''Don’t set options that expire in when everyone’s likely to be out of the office.''
+Error no.1 — a bit of a schoolboy error, frankly — was to have notice deadline which expired during the Christmas holidays. But that’s as may be. (In fairness, it’s not ''that'' outlandish to expect a hotel to be open in the Christmas holidays.) But  as a rule of thumb it’s best not to have your options expire at Christmas. Anyway, the learning here is this: ''Don’t set options that expire in when everyone’s likely to be out of the office.''
 Error no. 2 — less of a schoolboy one, in [[Jolly Contrarian|this reviewer’s]] opinion – was to presume that an [[email]], being, after all, an '''electronic''' mail '''message''' sent over a computer '''system''' (so sayeth [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email Wikipedia]) counted as an “[[electronic messaging system]]”.