Gross negligence: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|glossary|}}''For an essay on the related question “why would one ''use'' negligence in a legal contract at all?” see the article about “[[contractual negligence]]”. For a short answer to that question try this: Unless one has an [[indemnity]], '''one shouldn’t'''.''
{{a|glossary|{{subtable|{{liability ladder}}}}}}''For an essay on the related question “why would one ''use'' negligence in a legal contract at all?” see the article about “[[contractual negligence]]”. For a short answer to that question try this: Unless one has an [[indemnity]], '''one shouldn’t'''.''
===A spiritually bankrupt concept===
===A spiritually bankrupt concept===
When negotiating to save the adjective “gross”, the best available tack — and it’s not that good, really — is to say “look, if we muck up we’re hardly going to stand on ceremony, are we? So don’t worry about the legal docs”.
When negotiating to save the adjective “gross”, the best available tack — and it’s not that good, really — is to say “look, if we muck up we’re hardly going to stand on ceremony, are we? So don’t worry about the legal docs”.
Line 30: Line 30:


That this is a thing — and even that it is [[market standard]] — is no grounds for yielding to a [[US attorney]] who insists on foisting it on you.
That this is a thing — and even that it is [[market standard]] — is no grounds for yielding to a [[US attorney]] who insists on foisting it on you.
{{sa}}
*[[Degrees of liability]]
{{ref}}