Guarantee: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A form of {{t|credit support}} where one chap agrees to make good the obligations of another chap to a third party, if the second chap can’t or won’t.  
{{a|security|}}A form of {{t|credit support}} where one chap agrees to make good the obligations of another chap to a third party, if the second chap can’t or won’t.  
===Types of [[guarantee]]===
===Types of [[guarantee]]===
There's a saying in legal circles: [[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]: ''little old ladies make bad law''.
There's a saying in legal circles: [[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]: ''little old ladies make bad law''.
Line 14: Line 14:
'''[[Assignment]] of a [[Guarantor]]’s rights'''<br>
'''[[Assignment]] of a [[Guarantor]]’s rights'''<br>
A Guarantor has certain rights it acquires at law, even where it executes as a deed (such as the right of subrogation), and there is a risk that a [[guarantor]] who assigns these rights might somehow mysteriously compromise a beneficiary’s rights under the guarantee. So, to be sure, limit that right of assignment.
A Guarantor has certain rights it acquires at law, even where it executes as a deed (such as the right of subrogation), and there is a risk that a [[guarantor]] who assigns these rights might somehow mysteriously compromise a beneficiary’s rights under the guarantee. So, to be sure, limit that right of assignment.
'''Parental [[guarantee]]s under the {{isdama}}'''<br>
'''Parental [[guarantee]]s under the {{isdama}}'''<br>
{{isdaguaranteewarning}}
{{isdaguaranteewarning}}
'''The perils of unilateral termination rights'''<br>
'''The perils of unilateral termination rights'''<br>
A related point: be careful about allowing the [[guarantor]] a termination right, even if amounts owing before termination are meant to remain [[guarantee|guaranteed]]. For a [[mark-to- market]] exposure under a [[master agreement]], whither the guaranteed obligation ? The [[mark-to-market]] exposure isn't, of itself, an obligation, at least not until until the contract has been closed out. Until then it is an emergent property of all the live [[transaction|transactions]] under the [[master agreement]]. Nor are those transactions "existing obligations" in whole: each will comprise future obligations, which may be contingent, and in any case are not yet due.  
A related point: be careful about allowing the [[guarantor]] a termination right, even if amounts owing before termination are meant to remain [[guarantee|guaranteed]]. For a [[mark-to- market]] exposure under a [[master agreement]], whither the guaranteed obligation ? The [[mark-to-market]] exposure isn't, of itself, an obligation, at least not until until the contract has been closed out. Until then it is an emergent property of all the live [[transaction|transactions]] under the [[master agreement]]. Nor are those transactions "existing obligations" in whole: each will comprise future obligations, which may be contingent, and in any case are not yet due.  
Line 28: Line 30:
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Subrogation]]
*[[Subrogation]]
__NOTOC__