Hadley v Baxendale: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
:''But, on the other hand, if these special circumstances were wholly unknown to the party breaking the contract, '''he, at the most, could only be supposed to have had in his contemplation the amount of injury which would arise generally, and in the great multitude of cases not affected by any special circumstances, from such a breach of contract'''. For such loss would neither have flowed naturally from the breach of this contract in the great multitude of such cases occurring under ordinary circumstances, nor were the special circumstances, which, perhaps, would have made it a reasonable and natural consequence of such breach of contract, communicated to or known by the defendants. ''
:''But, on the other hand, if these special circumstances were wholly unknown to the party breaking the contract, '''he, at the most, could only be supposed to have had in his contemplation the amount of injury which would arise generally, and in the great multitude of cases not affected by any special circumstances, from such a breach of contract'''. For such loss would neither have flowed naturally from the breach of this contract in the great multitude of such cases occurring under ordinary circumstances, nor were the special circumstances, which, perhaps, would have made it a reasonable and natural consequence of such breach of contract, communicated to or known by the defendants. ''


Loss of profits are not necessarily indirect losses: {{cite|Polypearl Ltd|E.On Energy Solutions Ltd|2014|EWHC|3045}}
[[Loss of profit]]s are not necessarily [[indirect loss]]es: {{cite|Polypearl Ltd|E.On Energy Solutions Ltd|2014|EWHC|3045}}