Heuristic: Difference between revisions

411 bytes added ,  2 January 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


Heuristics are gold-dust in the hands of [[subject matter expert]]s — because they require expertise and judgment to use them correctly — but a disaster in the hands of [[the great unwashed]], for whom [[algorithm]]s area much better bet.
Heuristics are gold-dust in the hands of [[subject matter expert]]s — because they require expertise and judgment to use them correctly — but a disaster in the hands of [[the great unwashed]], for whom [[algorithm]]s area much better bet.
If you want an empassioned advocate of heuristics as being not just faster and more convenient than “full English” of scientific method, but a different, better and basically more effective way of getting by, look no further than {{author|Gerd Gigerenzer}}, and books of his like {{br|Risk Savvy: How To Make Good Decisions}}.


Some heuristics:
Some heuristics:
{{heuristic|The most thoughtful opinions are expressed in two-star and four-star customer reviews}}
{{heuristic|The most thoughtful opinions are expressed in two-star and four-star customer reviews}}


{{Seealso}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Policy]] as shorthand. Ok on the production line; dangerous at the [[frontier]].
*[[Algorithm]]
*[[Algorithm]]
*[[Substance and form]]
*[[Substance and form]]
*[[Beware of shorthand]], but [[it’s okay to generalise]]
*[[Beware of shorthand]], but [[it’s okay to generalise]]
*[[Maxims and arrows]]
*[[Maxims and arrows]]