Hughes v Metropolitan Railway: Difference between revisions

Hughes v Metropolitan Railway (view source)

6 bytes added , 25 March 2020

no edit summary

82,891

edits

Revision as of 11:28, 25 March 2020 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:29, 25 March 2020 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[promissory estoppel]], seized on by the late, great [[Lord Denning]] in the celebrated {{casenote\|Central London Property Trust Ltd\|High Trees House Ltd}}.		{{cn}}The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[promissory estoppel]], seized on by the late, great [[Lord Denning]] in the celebrated {{casenote\|Central London Property Trust Ltd\|High Trees House Ltd}}.

	Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October.		Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October.