82,891
edits
Hughes v Metropolitan Railway: Difference between revisions
Hughes v Metropolitan Railway (view source)
Revision as of 19:12, 19 December 2020
, 19 December 2020Amwelladmin moved page Hughes v Metropolitan Railway - Case Note to Hughes v Metropolitan Railway
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Hughes v Metropolitan Railway - Case Note to Hughes v Metropolitan Railway) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[estoppel]]. | {{cn}}The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[promissory estoppel]], seized on by the late, great [[Lord Denning]] in the celebrated {{casenote|Central London Property Trust Ltd|High Trees House Ltd}}. | ||
Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October. | Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*{{casenote|Central London Property Trust Ltd|High Trees House Ltd}} | |||
*[https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1877/1.html judgment] | *[https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1877/1.html judgment] | ||
[[Waiver by estoppel]] | [[Waiver by estoppel]] | ||