82,891
edits
Hughes v Metropolitan Railway: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[estoppel]]. | |||
Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October. | Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1877/1.html judgment] | *[https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1877/1.html judgment] | ||
[[Waiver by estoppel]] | |||