Human resources: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|people|}}{{g}}Once known as “[[personnel]]” then, in the heady days before [[investment banking]] become an embarrassing career choice “[[human capital management]]”, those sainted professionals now usually known as [[human resources]] are possibly the ''least'' resourceful group of humans to ever emerge from the dark ages of free enterprise.  
{{A|people|}}{{g}}If a name change is the best way to "reboot the franchise", odds are the basics of the business are suspect. For better or worse, [[sales]] will forever be [[sales]]; [[trading]] resolutely [[trading]], and even dear old [[legal]] will always be [[legal]] <ref>Office of the [[General Counsel]] notwithstanding. </ref>, but the good people of [[personnel]] can't help reinventing themselves. In the heady days before [[investment banking]] become an embarrassing career choice they were “[[human capital management]]”; as the {{t|dogma}} of automation began to bite they became “[[human resources]]”, as that fad blew itself out they rebranded as directorate of [[talent]] acquisition.  


Some have claimed [[human resources]] departments are some kind of [[extended phenotype]] — an adaptation that the rest of us depend upon for our own survival. The better view is that ''we'' are an [[extended phenotype]] of ''theirs'' (in the same way that wheat domesticated homo sapiens and not vice versa).
Some have claimed [[human resources]] departments are some kind of [[extended phenotype]] — an adaptation that the rest of us depend upon for our own survival. The better view is that ''we'' are an [[extended phenotype]] of ''theirs'' (in the same way that wheat domesticated homo sapiens and not vice versa).