|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat2|isda|Indemnifiable Tax|1992|Indemnifiable Tax|2002}} | | {{nman|isda|2002|Indemnifiable Tax}} |
| ====Commentary====
| |
| Without wishing to be overly negative, this one truly comes from the "wow" file in indefensible drafting:
| |
| | |
| :... ''other than'' a tax which would ''not'' be imposed ''but for''...
| |
| | |
| Not only a triple negative, but since ISDAs definition of {{isdaprov|Tax}} already contains a negative (being any tax that isn’t a {{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}}) and “{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}” is itself often used in the negative (e.g. “a tax which is [[not]] an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}”) — or even ''[[double negative]]'' (e.g. “''other than'' a tax which is not an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}”) in the body of the {{isdama}}. That makes it a '''''sextuple negative'''''. Quite a literary feat.
| |
| ====In a {{nutshell}}====
| |
| A need to know version is this:
| |
| :{{Nutshell ISDA Indemnifiable Tax}}
| |
| {{Withholding under ISDA}}
| |
| ====See Also====
| |
| See in particular Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}} ({{isdaprov|Deduction or Withholding for Tax}}).
| |
| | |
| {{ref}}
| |