82,891
edits
Indemnity in an NDA: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{confianat|Indemnity}} | {{confianat|Indemnity}} | ||
===Indemnities generally=== | |||
{{Indemnitycapsule}} | {{Indemnitycapsule}} | ||
===[[Indemnities]] in [[confidentiality agreement]]s=== | |||
You may conclude, based on the above, than [[indemnity]] is not usually justified in a [[confidentiality agreement]]. This would be a sound conclusion., but it will not stop uppity counterparties insisting on them — fewer things are less well understood than indemnities. | |||
It is hard enough to establish ''ordinary'' [[contractual damages]] for breach of a financial markets [[confidentiality agreement]] — there is a reason for that mealy mouthed acknowledgment that “damages may not be an adequate remedy and the {{confiprov|discloser}} may seek equitable relief” — and you may like to challenge your counterparty to give an example of the sort of loss she things would be covered by an [[indemnity]]. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Indemnities]] | |||
*[[Contractual damages]] | |||
*{{confiprov|Remedies}} | |||