Informal systems: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|devil|<center><youtube>https://youtu.be/qZagNxRZC_8</youtube></center>}}There is much talk in these pages of [[Models.Behaving.Badly|model]]<nowiki/>s, [[narrative]]<nowiki/>s, [[complexity]], [[systems theory]], and “[[high modernism]]” as the all-encompassing modern management [[dogma]] that knits all of these things together.  
{{A|systems|}}There is much talk in these pages of [[Models.Behaving.Badly|model]]s, [[narrative]], [[complexity]], [[systems theory]], and “[[high modernism]]” as the all-encompassing modern management [[dogma]] that knits all of these things together.  


Our fascination with [[algorithm]]s, [[big data]], [[artificial intelligence]] and [[The Singularity is Near - Book Review|exponentially accelerating technologisation]] leads us to believe we can [[Reductionism|reduce]] the world’s ''organisation'', and therefore its ''problems'', down to predictable, rationalisable, atomised units.
Our fascination with [[algorithm]]s, [[big data]], [[artificial intelligence]] and [[The Singularity is Near - Book Review|exponentially accelerating technologisation]] leads us to believe we can [[Reductionism|reduce]] the world’s ''organisation'', and therefore its ''problems'', down to predictable, rationalisable, atomised units.
Line 11: Line 11:
Thus, a model is not just an inadequate representation of how a system behaves; it is a politically-enforced model that ''corrupts'' the behaviour of the system in itself.<ref>{{Author|Jane Jacobs}} makes the same observation about the modernist city planners of the 1940s and 1950s.</ref>  
Thus, a model is not just an inadequate representation of how a system behaves; it is a politically-enforced model that ''corrupts'' the behaviour of the system in itself.<ref>{{Author|Jane Jacobs}} makes the same observation about the modernist city planners of the 1940s and 1950s.</ref>  


Also pitted against the [[Reductionism|reductionist]]s and the [[High modernism|high modernists]] are the systems theorists and complexity people, two of whom are featured in the video in the panel. Joe Norman (to the right) makes an interesting assertion that, in any system, ''informality'' — arrangements outside the model or that the model cannot see and therefore treats as non-existent — are fundamental to its operation. Indeed, the “formal” parts of a system are just small islands in a sea of informal relations.
Also pitted against the [[Reductionism|reductionist]]s and the [[High modernism|high modernists]] are the systems theorists and complexity people, two of whom are featured in the video in the panel. Joe Norman<ref>https://youtu.be/qZagNxRZC_8<ref> makes an interesting assertion that, in any system, ''informality'' — arrangements outside the model or that the model cannot see and therefore treats as non-existent — are fundamental to its operation. Indeed, the “formal” parts of a system are just small islands in a sea of informal relations.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[The map and the territory]]
*[[The map and the territory]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}