Inhouse counsel: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


=== Inhouse counsel and the difficult subject of [[value]] ===
=== Inhouse counsel and the difficult subject of [[value]] ===
In this and many other ways their incentives are inverted. Where a [[private practice lawyer]] is a profit centre: one that profits from ''discord'' the more of it, and the longer it takes to untangle, the better — an in-house lawyer resolutely is ''not''. Inhouse counsel don’t generate revenue: they can’t — they are not ''allowed'' to. They ''cost'' revenue. This is not just by coincidence: the [[legal department]] is by its very ''[[ontology]]'' a cost centre.   
In this and many other ways their incentives are inverted. Where a [[private practice lawyer]] is a [[profit centre]] — one that profits from ''discord'': the more of it, and the longer it takes to untangle, the better — an inhouse lawyer resolutely is ''not''. Inhouse counsel don’t generate revenue: they can’t — they are not ''allowed'' to. They ''cost'' revenue. This is not just by coincidence: the [[legal department]] is by its very ''[[ontology]]'' a [[cost centre]].   


This does not stop giddy [[general counsel]], [[from time to time]], alighting on the idea that perhaps they might like to be a profit centre. To be sure, this would be an excellent corrective to the unimaginative disposition usually held by the [[chief operating office]] when it holds the legal function in contemplation: that it is a blight, a cost, a drag and, at the end of the day, a roadblock: a costly department stocked with expensive professionals whose main talent seems to be coming up with creative ways to say “''no''”.
This does not stop giddy [[general counsel]], [[from time to time]], alighting on the idea that perhaps they might like to ''be'' a [[profit centre]].  


“But many of our lawyers are commercial and creative, and they ''do'' contribute to the successful execution of banking deal flow,” she will think to herself. She may even articulate this thought to her management committee. And, indeed, it is quite so: inhouse lawyers are frequently vital. “So, why should we not be credited with our contribution?
To be sure, this would be an excellent corrective to the [[chief operating office]]’s disposition when it beholds the legal function: that it is a blight, a [[Cost reduction|cost]], a drag and, at the end of the day, a roadblock: a department stocked with expensive professionals whose main talent seems to be coming up with creative ways to say “''no''


Here, if she is lucky, someone on her management committee will object. For it is easy to forget, but there are many simple, axiomatic answers to this question: the importance of segregating those divisions whose primary mandate is defensive from those whose role is to seek out reward — that kind of thing. But one can quickly become bogged down with distracting details and lose sight of the wood for all the argumentative trees. An easier way of remembering and shutting off this debate before it gets going is the single word: “[[Enron|''Enron'']]”. ''[[Enron Corporation|Enron]]'' is what happens when you turn a risk control function into a profit centre.
“But many of our lawyers are commercial and creative, and they ''do'' contribute to the successful execution of banking deal flow,” the [[General counsel|GC]] will think to herself. She may even articulate this to her management committee, and they will agree: inhouse lawyers are frequently vital. “So, why should we not be credited with our contribution?”
 
Here, if she is lucky, a brave soul on that committee will object: for it is easy to be carried away, but there are many simple, axiomatic answers to this question: the importance of segregating those whose mandate is ''defensive'' from those whose role is to seek out reward — that kind of thing. One can quickly become bogged down with distracting details and lose sight of the wood for all the argumentative trees. But there is a single word which should bring a GC to her senses if carried away with such a frolicsome idea: “[[Enron|''Enron'']]”. ''[[Enron Corporation|Enron]]'' is what happens when you turn a control function into a profit centre.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}