Inhouse legal team of the year: Difference between revisions

Inhouse legal team of the year (view source)

Revision as of 11:32, 3 December 2019

9 bytes added , 3 December 2019

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :*refusing to hear of modifications to your drafting notwithstanding its incomprehensibility;<ref>{{Bold full stop}}</ref>
 :*extensive markups of closing agendas, bible tables of content and [[process agent]] appointment letters, relative to substantive comments on deal documentation;
-*'''Throw the associate under the bus''': How shamelessly will you blame the most [[Private practice lawyer|junior member of outside counsel team]] — the same one whose name you keep forgetting and whose explanations count for nothing in the “can I speak to a partner please” category — for neglecting to prepare and circulate “critical legal documentation” that has, in fact, been in your inbox since 4.30 a.m. on the Saturday morning immediately following your [[6 p.m.]] request for it?
+*'''Throw the associate under the bus''': How shamelessly will you blame the most [[Private practice lawyer|junior member of outside counsel team]] — the same one whose name you keep forgetting and whose explanations count for nothing in the “yes, but can I speak to a partner please” category — for neglecting to prepare and circulate “critical legal documentation” that has, in fact, been in your inbox since 4.30 a.m. on the Saturday morning immediately following your [[6 p.m.]] request for it?
 *'''External law-firm management''': How insistent are you in requiring any external spend over £2,500 to go through a mandatory three-way bidding process?
 *'''[[Panel discussion]]s''': Points are available for persistent self-publication, on [[LinkedIn]], of participation in a “stimulating discussion about Phase 3 regulatory IM today!!!”