Inhouse legal team of the year: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|people|}}To bring some rigour to the annual [[Awards]] season, and short of some kind of centralised games whereby different legal teams gather together to compete in a series of professional disciplines, the [[JC]] is pleased to announce some standardised criteria for judging panels to assess finalists for the [[inhouse legal team of the year]] award.
{{a|people|}}To bring some rigour to the annual [[Awards]] season, and short of some kind of centralised games whereby different legal teams gather together to duel, or compete in a series of professional disciplines — [[tedium]] endurance events and so on — the [[JC]] is pleased to announce some standardised criteria by which judging panels, who plainly have no clue otherwise — to assess finalists for [[inhouse legal team of the year]] [[Awards|award]]s.
 
Any experienced [[inhouse lawyer]] will tell you, the following are the core skills:


*'''Timeliness of brief''': How reliably does your team sync to the magical 6pm deadline before dropping a “drafts required by open of business tomorrow” instruction on [[Private practice lawyer|external advisors]]?
*'''Timeliness of brief''': How reliably does your team sync to the magical 6pm deadline before dropping a “drafts required by open of business tomorrow” instruction on [[Private practice lawyer|external advisors]]?