Insurance: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}In concept a great idea. In practice, often a stupid one which creates risks, costs and bureaucracy where none would otherwise exist.<ref>I told you I was a contrarian, didn’t I?</ref>
{{g}}In concept a great idea. In practice, often a stupid one which creates risks, costs and bureaucracy where none would otherwise exist.<ref>I told you I was a contrarian, didn’t I?</ref> Much insurance is [[iatrongenics]], in {{author|Nassim Micholas Taleb}}’s argot, writ large.


An [[insurance]] contract protects a person of limited resources from a remote but outsized [[risk]]. The theory is that by being a small part of a large class of people each of whom paying an affordable running [[premium]], you are protected from colossal costs that may never happen. Thus you mutualise your risk of [[loss]].
An [[insurance]] contract protects a person of limited resources from a remote but outsized [[risk]]. The theory is that by being a small part of a large class of people each of whom paying an affordable running [[premium]], you are protected from colossal costs that may never happen. Thus you mutualise your risk of [[loss]].
Line 21: Line 21:
Well, hold on tiger.
Well, hold on tiger.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Iatrogenics]]
*{{author|Nassim Nicholas Taleb}}
*[[Risk - Risk Article]]
*[[Risk - Risk Article]]
{{Ref}}
{{Ref}}