82,891
edits
Insurance: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In concept a great idea. In practice, often a stupid one which creates risks, costs and bureaucracy where none would otherwise exist.<ref>I told you I was a contrarian, didn’t I?</ref> | {{g}}In concept a great idea. In practice, often a stupid one which creates risks, costs and bureaucracy where none would otherwise exist.<ref>I told you I was a contrarian, didn’t I?</ref> Much insurance is [[iatrogenics]], in {{author|Nassim Nicholas Taleb}}’s argot, writ large. | ||
An [[insurance]] contract protects a person of limited resources from a remote but outsized [[risk]]. The theory is that by being a small part of a large class of people each of whom paying an affordable running [[premium]], you are protected from colossal costs that may never happen. Thus you mutualise your risk of [[loss]]. | An [[insurance]] contract protects a person of limited resources from a remote but outsized [[risk]]. The theory is that by being a small part of a large class of people each of whom paying an affordable running [[premium]], you are protected from colossal costs that may never happen. Thus you mutualise your risk of [[loss]]. | ||
{{ | {{quote| | ||
'''Example''': | '''Example''': | ||
In a group of 1000 people, each has a 1% chance of a £100,000 loss in a ten year period. | In a group of 1000 people, each has a 1% chance of a £100,000 loss in a ten year period. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Well, hold on tiger. | Well, hold on tiger. | ||
So, a shaggy dog story: Against his better judgement, the [[JC]] is, for reasons that are now too ghastly to recount or even remember, an accredited level 2 ECB [[cricket]] coach. During that accreditation course, which he would not recommend to his worst enemy, candidates suffered a presentation by the ECB’s ''Association of Cricket Officials'' {{ikr}} about the benefits of membership of that august body. | |||
Now every now and then the [[JC]] can come on all a bit misanthropic, and this rainy Saturday afternoon in March was just such a day. | |||
“Why on God’s barren earth,” he wondered aloud, “would anyone want to ''pay money'' to be in an association like this?” | |||
The best answer the fellow presenting — a member himself, of course — could give was, “because you would benefit from our [[public liability insurance]] policy. That is where the lion’s share of your membership dues go.” Now the “public liability” concerned was that of an amateur coach, on exercises with his team, when some accident befell one of the delicate little flowers in his charge, which might be attributable to the coach’s carelessness or lack of prudent regard. | |||
Now here’s the thing. Coaching [[cricket]] is a pitiless pastime, in every possible way. You are not thanked for it, let alone paid for it. You certainly don’t grow rich from it — except spiritually, of course. You do it out of the goodness of your heart, a vague sense of moral obligation to the forthcoming generation, and a forlorn hope that some of the little ingrates might grow to love the game, for it is a wonderful diversion from the encroaching enormity of growing old. So, any parent who gets a Sunday morning lie-in while you stand in a wind-swept field explaining the rudiments of the back-foot drive to little Basil, but yet has ''civil [[litigation]]'' uppermost in his mind — and not profound, undying gratitude — should Basil cop a short one on the bonce, should rot in hell. He should be ''grateful'', as a default disposition, rather than opportunistically ''extortionate''.<ref>He won’t be, of course — that’s just the cruel reality of the human condition for you — but he ''should''.</ref> | |||
All the same, [[cricket]] is a perilous pastime. That 5½ oz leather-encased cork ball flies about at a decent lick. If it clocks junior, or he sprains his ankle, gets run over or somehow contracts hepatitis, then (a) that will do him, and the world, the world of good, long term, and (b) unless you, coach, are some kind of pederast or have been egregiously delinquent when supervising young Tarquin, his adequately socialised parents<ref>They won’t be, of course: they named the pompous little bugger Tarquin, after all, so you know they lack fundamental empathy, and anyway the apple does not fall far from the tree, does it?</ref> — even neurotic North London ones — will shrug shoulders and figure that’s the price of being a lazy sod and letting other people look after their kids. | |||
Will they ''sue'' you? Of course not. It is too much of a faff. For one thing, you are probably on the bones of your arse, and what judge is going to be in punitive frame of mind when considering a well-intended volunteer doing his best to look after someone else’s brat? | |||
Yet all that might change, ''should you benefit from public liability [[insurance]]''. Suddenly it isn’t ''your'' pocket that helicopter mum is going after. It is worth a claim. To be sure, the insurer will refuse the claim for as long as is commercially plausible, whatever its merits — that’s part of the funding model, for many of them — but in the mean time it will put up premiums, citing actuarial data, because of its assessed dereliction of obligation of the insured. Your own membership for the ECBACO might only go up a fiver, but in the mean time the insurance company is ''creaming it''. | |||
So, yes: public liability insurance encourages crappy behaviour from everyone concerned: | |||
*''You'' are disincentivised from taking suitable care because — hey, you’re insured, right? | |||
*''Helicopter mum'' is encouraged to [[Noli mentula esse|be a dick]] and make a claim, since it’s not thou well-intentioned volunteer coach she’s going after but a faceless corporate insurer, and | |||
*''Faceless corporate insurer'', being little more than a faceless corporate mode of extortion, will tell Helicopter Mum where to get off — there will be an exclusion — ''and'' gouge the poor old cricket association — and by extension ''you'' — by jacking up its premiums on account of its transparently negligent membership. Helicopter Mum, having embarked on the road to litigation may be inclined to put more money after bad in pursuing you in your person capacity, notwithstanding your impecuniosity. | |||
===The fastest car in the world: a rental car=== | |||
Sits towards the “airbags” end of the “[[airbag - steering-wheel continuum]]” as insurers have no standing or view of the day-to-day risk situation and can't direct client activities to avoid it. The client, by contrast, is incentivised too run the model hard, since it is insured I'd the model blows up, but paid the same in premium however conservatively it drives. (Okay that is not entirely true, but even with telemetry and no claims bonuses, the incentives are comparatively weak). | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Iatrogenics]] | |||
*{{author|Nassim Nicholas Taleb}} | |||
*[[Risk - Risk Article]] | *[[Risk - Risk Article]] | ||
{{Ref}} | {{Ref}} | ||