Intellectual property: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


{{Copyright and confidence}}
{{Copyright and confidence}}
===As a paradigm in crisis===
Is AI the problem, or IP?
IP emerged as a way to allocate resources in an analogue age in which it was impractical to extract abstract “intellectual property” from its [[substrate]]. One could therefore control IP by controlling replication of the substrate. it wasn’t really a “data” problem.
The information revolution (which started with the [[Jacquard loom]]) has changed all that. IP has long struggled with sampling, remixes, digital collaboration and even packet switching<ref>See {{author|Lawrence Lessing}}’s {{br|Code: Version 2.0}}.</ref> (the internet, on several levels, is one collossal transgression/falsification of the idea of [[copyright]]). The emergence of [[AI]] assistance in content generation is a further degeneration of the IP [[paradigm]]. It’s irretrievably broken.
In a digital universe, where you can bifurcate information from [[substrate]], the idea of intellectual property in [[data]] is little more than unjustified state-sponsored monopoly enablement. The [[Rolling Stones]] wrote [[Satisfaction]] in 15, minutes Keith Richards literally while asleep. What justification is there for their exclusive rights to that arrangement of data in (almost) perpetuity?
Ask not how AI fits into the intellectual property rules, therefore, but how we should reimagine the legal framework for the commercial exploitation of data.
{{Ref⁵}}