|
|
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{csaanat|1|2016}} | | {{nman|csa|2016|1}} |
| '''Nomenclature''': Being an annex to an {{isdama}}, references to the “{{isdaprov|Agreement}}” means that particular {{isdama}}; the “{{vmcsaprov|Annex}}” is the {{tag|CSA}} and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “{{isdaprov|Schedule}}” is the schedule to the {{isdama}}.
| |
| | |
| {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}s as a concept only arrives in the {{2016csa}}. Until then, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s are covered or not is to say something like:
| |
| “
| |
| [SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining ““[[Exposure - CSA Provision|Exposure]]”” under the {{csa}}.
| |
| ”
| |