82,891
edits
Inure: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|plainenglish|}}[[Inure]] | {{a|plainenglish|}}[[Inure]] /ɪˈnjʊə,ɪˈnjɔː/ ''[[Verb|v.]] (pedantic)'': Of a legal right, especially one arising under a [[contract]], to belong to, or be available to, a person. | ||
/ɪˈnjʊə,ɪˈnjɔː/ | |||
''[[Verb]] | |||
This is often seen in the context of [[successors and assigns]], like so: “this [[contract]] will be binding upon and [[inure]] to the benefit of the parties hereto, and their [[successors and assigns]]”. | This is often seen in the context of [[successors and assigns]], like so: “this [[contract]] will be binding upon and [[inure]] to the benefit of the parties hereto, and their [[successors and assigns]]”. | ||
Why to the benefit of? Because it is the verbal construction that provides enough diversion to obscure the fact that this is a statement of not jsut the bleeding obvious, but the necessarily true. A contract creates rights and obligations in and of itself; there is no need to further inure them to anyone. The inheritance of a right between a dying, or merging, or assigning counterpasrty is likewise an operation of some other legal process (perhaps a novation, merger or the laws surrounding probate and succession) and not, principally contract (except where it bars [[assignment]]). I have a right. Thus, inuring is purest {{tag|flannel}}. If you are a party to a contract your counterparty's [[obligation|obligations]] are legally binding. That’s all you need to know. [[Chicken licken]], relax: the sky will not fall on your head if you don't say they “[[inure]]” to you. Or, for that matter, to you [[successors and assigns]]. | Why to the benefit of? Because it is the verbal construction that provides enough diversion to obscure the fact that this is a statement of not jsut the bleeding obvious, but the necessarily true. A contract creates rights and obligations in and of itself; there is no need to further inure them to anyone. The inheritance of a right between a dying, or merging, or assigning counterpasrty is likewise an operation of some other legal process (perhaps a novation, merger or the laws surrounding probate and succession) and not, principally contract (except where it bars [[assignment]]). I have a right. Thus, inuring is purest {{tag|flannel}}. If you are a party to a contract your counterparty's [[obligation|obligations]] are legally binding. That’s all you need to know. [[Chicken licken]], relax: the sky will not fall on your head if you don't say they “[[inure]]” to you. Or, for that matter, to you [[successors and assigns]]. | ||