82,903
edits
Jacquard loom: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}}The [[Jacquard loom]] was a power loom that simplified the process of manufacturing textiles with such complex patterns as ''brocade'', ''damask'' and ''matelassé'' with the use of punched cards. It was invented by [[Joseph Marie Jacquard]] in 1804, and technology guru {{author|James Burke}} — a super cool seventies guy and former of great impressions on the young [[JC]] — hailed it as an early example of a computer in his magnificent, formative-impression inducing TV series, ''[[Connections]]''. | }}The [[Jacquard loom]] was a power loom that simplified the process of manufacturing textiles with such complex patterns as ''brocade'', ''damask'' and ''matelassé'' with the use of punched cards. It was invented by [[Joseph Marie Jacquard]] in 1804, and technology guru {{author|James Burke}} — a super cool seventies guy and former of great impressions on the young [[JC]] — hailed it as an early example of a computer in his magnificent, formative-impression inducing TV series, ''[[Connections]]''. | ||
Now, in 1805, was there a [[thought leader]] like former Deutsche Bank chief [[Rumours of our demise are greatly exaggerated - technology article|John “Hot Take” Cryan]] on hand to | Now, in 1805, was there a [[thought leader]] like former Deutsche Bank chief [[Rumours of our demise are greatly exaggerated - technology article|John “Hot Take” Cryan]] on hand to declare, “Right. That’s it. Human usefulness as we know it is over. We are all going to become machines”? | ||
Not as far as we know. Though | Not as far as we know. Though there probably was, and he too became a victim of [[survivor bias]] and no record remains of him or his sagacity. | ||
In the meantime, what do we think happened to intricately-woven fabric, now it could be quickly produced with minimal labour? Did this mean [[rentier]] capitalists, finally freed of the burden of wasteful servants, could reap colossal margins while their monstrous machines pumped out acres and acres of expensive fabric for an insatiable market of wealthy, but now underemployed, former hand-weavers? | In the meantime, what do we think happened to intricately-woven fabric, now it could be quickly produced with minimal labour? Did this mean [[rentier]] capitalists, finally freed of the burden of wasteful servants, could reap colossal margins while their monstrous machines pumped out acres and acres of expensive fabric for an insatiable market of wealthy, but now underemployed, former hand-weavers? | ||
Well, it didn’t, did it, readers? ''Woven fabric plummeted in price''. Of ''course'' it did. Because ''anyone'' could produce it now. All you needed was a [[Jacquard loom]]. And all of a sudden ''every bugger was buying [[Jacquard loom]]s.'' | |||
''Woven fabric plummeted in price''. Of ''course'' it did. Because ''anyone'' could produce it now. All you needed was a [[Jacquard loom]]. And all of a sudden ''every bugger was buying [[Jacquard loom]]s.'' | |||
Who could have predicted ''that''?<ref>Well; Adam Smith, for one.</ref> Loom owners no longer needed hand-weavers. But the poor hand-weavers had no time to enjoy their new-found leisure, much less to pen think-pieces about [[technological unemployment]] or [[universal basic income]], for they were urgently needed to programme, maintain and enhance these fancy new automatic [[Jacquard loom]]s. | Who could have predicted ''that''?<ref>Well; Adam Smith, for one.</ref> Loom owners no longer needed hand-weavers. But the poor hand-weavers had no time to enjoy their new-found leisure, much less to pen think-pieces about [[technological unemployment]] or [[universal basic income]], for they were urgently needed to programme, maintain and enhance these fancy new automatic [[Jacquard loom]]s. | ||