82,891
edits
Kelly v Solari: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Rolfe B had this to say: | Rolfe B had this to say: | ||
{{quote| | {{quote|But I agree that Mr. Platt has a right to go to the jury again, upon two grounds: first, that the jury may possibly find that the directors had not in truth forgotten the fact; and secondly, they may also come to the conclusion, that they had determined that they would not expose the office to unpopularity, and would therefore pay the money at all events; in which case I quite agree they could not recover it back. <br> | ||
Rule absolute for a new trial.}} | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Mistake]] | |||
*[http://www.commonlii.org/int/cases/EngR/1841/1087.pdf Judgment transcript] | *[http://www.commonlii.org/int/cases/EngR/1841/1087.pdf Judgment transcript] | ||
*[[Stupid banker cases]] | *[[Stupid banker cases]] | ||
*[[Anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]] | *[[Anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]] | ||
*[[Durum caseum per magnos canibus]] | *[[Durum caseum per magnos canibus]] | ||