82,964
edits
King’s Counsel: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
===Who should answer curly questions on ISDAs?=== | ===Who should answer curly questions on ISDAs?=== | ||
But every now and then, a thorny question might arise, as to the metaphysical chassis on which an {{isdama}}, or a {{ | But every now and then, a thorny question might arise, as to the metaphysical chassis on which an {{isdama}}, or a {{gmsla}}, or a {{gmra}} is engineered. It doesn’t happen often, but it is amazing when half a billion dollars is at stake how sharply one can focus on what might once have seen a dusty academic conceptualisation. Philosophical questions like this seem to perplex modern [[Magic circle law firm|magic circle]] [[partner]]s — people whose predecessors, let it be said, ''wrote'' the damn things, back in the day. | ||
So, if a practical person wanted a sensible answer on such a curly question, whom would she ask? | So, if a practical person wanted a sensible answer on such a curly question, whom would she ask? | ||