LIBOR rigging: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 179: Line 179:
:—Lord Hoffman in {{cite|Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd|West Bromwich Building Society|1998|1 WLR|896}}}}
:—Lord Hoffman in {{cite|Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd|West Bromwich Building Society|1998|1 WLR|896}}}}


Plainly, what a contract means is fact-dependent. It is not, purely, a matter of law. A contract testifies to the parties’ mutual understanding. It cannot, “mistakes of fact” notwithstanding, be sovereign to it.
Interpreting the ''[[consensus ad idem]]'' manifested under a contract demands a wholly different approach than does construction of criminal legislation where the defendant’s understanding of the legislation is irrelevant.
Plainly, what a contract means is fact-dependent. A contract testifies to the parties’ mutual understanding and cannot, “mistakes of fact” notwithstanding, be sovereign to it.


And evidence of how ''everyone'' behaved when interacting with the LIBOR Definition will help with what a reasonable person would have understood it to mean. There can be no better indication of reasonableness than direct evidence of the behaviour of fellow [[Man on the Clapham Omnibus|passengers on the Clapham Omnibus]].  
Surely, evidence of how ''everyone'' behaved when interacting with the LIBOR Definition will help with what [[reasonable person|a reasonable person]] would have understood it to mean. There can be no better indication of reasonableness than direct evidence of the behaviour of fellow [[Man on the Clapham Omnibus|passengers on the Clapham Omnibus]].  


There is here the odd spectre of the law of [[contract]] forming the backdrop to a criminal allegation. This is rare. Usually, the criminal authorities stay well out of commercial disputes, even where allegations of fraud are flying around, seeing them as a matter of civil loss between merchants perfectly able to look after themselves, and not requiring the machinery of the state.   
There is here the odd spectre of the law of [[contract]] forming the backdrop to a criminal allegation. This is rare. Usually, the criminal authorities stay well out of commercial disputes, even where allegations of fraud are flying around, seeing them as a matter of civil loss between merchants perfectly able to look after themselves, and not requiring the machinery of the state.   


[[LIBOR]], on which the bank deposits and mortgage repayments of unwitting retail punters depend, made things a bit different. This is no private matter to be sorted out between gentlemen with revolvers.   
[[LIBOR]], on which the bank deposits and mortgage repayments of unwitting retail punters depend, made things a bit different. This is no private matter to be sorted out between gentlemen with revolvers.   


Nevertheless, still one must apply contractual principles, not criminal ones, to matters of contractual practice.  
Nevertheless, still one must apply contractual principles, not criminal ones, to matters of contractual practice.