82,927
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{maximgeneration}} | {{a|latin|}}{{maximgeneration}}An outrage in the eyes of anyone with an affection for [[plain English]], Latinisms are (with {{f|flannel}}) the most obvious device by which the profession puts its language beyond the comprehension of the laiety. Some, in fairness, neatly capture concepts that their English equivalents make a bit of a meal of — like [[mutatis mutandis]]. Others are really just buzzwords that young lawyers learn to use to sound competent in front of their elders. | ||
An outrage in the eyes of anyone with an affection for [[plain English]], Latinisms are (with {{f|flannel}}) the most obvious device by which the profession puts its language beyond the comprehension of the laiety. Some, in fairness, neatly capture concepts that their English equivalents make a bit of a meal of — like [[mutatis mutandis]]. Others are really just buzzwords that young lawyers learn to use to sound competent in front of their elders. | |||
===[[Latin]] buzzwords=== | ===[[Latin]] buzzwords=== | ||
Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
*{{maxim|nemo dat quod non habet}} | *{{maxim|nemo dat quod non habet}} | ||
*{{maxim|nolli mentula esse}} | *{{maxim|nolli mentula esse}} | ||
*{{maxim|what the eye | *{{maxim|what the eye don’t see the chef gets away with|quod occulo non videt coquus non est culpandum}} | ||
*{{maxim|Quod non potes videre, non mihi reprehendo}} | *{{maxim|Quod non potes videre, non mihi reprehendo}} | ||