Latin: Difference between revisions

25 bytes added ,  27 November 2016
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
Then there are legal maxims — pithy aphorisms describing fundamental principles of the common law — which their authors inevitably render in Latin, thereby making them sound like they have existed since the dawn of curial civilization, rather than having just been made up on the spot to fudge an awkward precedent.
Then there are legal maxims — pithy aphorisms describing fundamental principles of the common law — which their authors inevitably render in Latin, thereby making them sound like they have existed since the dawn of curial civilization, rather than having just been made up on the spot to fudge an awkward precedent.


Of course, anyone can play that game: anyone, that is, lucky enough to know someone with O-Level Latin, who can therefore make up legal maxims to one’s heart’s content.  This can be quite fun. Guess which ones are real and which ones aren’t:
Of course, anyone can play that game: anyone, that is, lucky enough to know [[secret Latin advisor|someone]] with O-Level Latin, who can therefore make up legal maxims to one’s heart’s content.  This can be quite fun. Guess which ones are real and which ones aren’t:


*[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]
*[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]