82,891
edits
Lawyer acceptance factor: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{A|design| | {{A|design| | ||
{{image|Wife appreciation factor|png|If you want it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.}}}}{{dpn|/ˈlɔːjər əkˈsɛptəns ˈfæktə/|n|}}A [[UAT]] multiplier for a [[legaltech]] implementation computed by considering the ratio of features the user will want, understand and use, against those her management wants, understands, and expects her to use; (ii) the things a lawyer habitually does that the [[legaltech]] will oblige her to ''not'' do, or do in a different, effortful or perverse way. | {{image|Wife appreciation factor|png|If you want it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.}}}}{{dpn|/ˈlɔːjər əkˈsɛptəns ˈfæktə/|n|}} | ||
A [[UAT]] multiplier for a [[legaltech]] implementation computed by considering the ratio of features the user will want, understand and use, against those her management wants, understands, and expects her to use; (ii) the things a lawyer habitually does that the [[legaltech]] will oblige her to ''not'' do, or do in a different, effortful or perverse way. | |||
In the olden days when hi-fi envy was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — the kind of attributes that would see that new pre-amplification gain-stage attenuator make it through the door without the missus hitting the roof. | In the olden days when hi-fi envy was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — the kind of attributes that would see that new pre-amplification gain-stage attenuator make it through the door without the missus hitting the roof. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
We mention this because the same goes, with feeling, when asking experienced lawyers to embark on a “user [[change journey]]” which has in mind a destination watched over by [[legaltech]] machines of loving grace. | We mention this because the same goes, with feeling, when asking experienced lawyers to embark on a “user [[change journey]]” which has in mind a destination watched over by [[legaltech]] machines of loving grace. | ||
They’re a stubborn, recalcitrant lot, | They’re a stubborn, recalcitrant lot, our sibling lawyers. | ||
The way they see it, they are already ''on'' a journey, it is [[tedious]] enough as it is, and they are not interested in being sent on some [[M.B.A.]]-initiated diversion intended to convert them into button-pushing [[Who breaks a hamster on a wheel?|hamsters]].<ref>This is either a mixed metaphor, or a new one. Can hamsters push buttons? Would they, if they could? Who knows.</ref> | The way they see it, they are already ''on'' a journey, it is [[tedious]] enough as it is, and they are not interested in being sent on some [[M.B.A.]]-initiated diversion intended to convert them into button-pushing [[Who breaks a hamster on a wheel?|hamsters]].<ref>This is either a mixed metaphor, or a new one. Can hamsters push buttons? Would they, if they could? Who knows.</ref> | ||