82,891
edits
Lawyer acceptance factor: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}}In the olden days when hi fi was still a thing, spoddy gentlemen used to talk about the “wife appreciation factor” — could I get my new kit in the door without the missus hitting the roof? Generally an awesome total harmonic distortion rating won’t cut it. It has to look ''good'' — ideally ''invisible''. | }}In the olden days when hi fi was still a thing, spoddy gentlemen used to talk about the “wife appreciation factor” — could I get my new kit in the door without the missus hitting the roof? Generally an awesome total harmonic distortion rating won’t cut it. It has to look ''good'' — ideally ''invisible''. | ||
Same goes | Same goes when embarking on a user change [[journey]], particularly one where the gang of redoubtable hobbits on that journey is comprised of members of the legal profession. The business case may write itself, the data granularity it promises to kick off may be overwhelming, but still it behoves a smart middle manager to consider how the “change journey” will present itself to the [[legal eagle]]s whom you expect to go on it. | ||
Because they’re a stubborn, recalcitrant lot, are our sibling lawyers. | |||
Contrary to received wisdom, and however vigorously they may, as a class, declare themselves proudly prehistoric when it comes to technology, lawyers are ''not'' universal Luddites, and will hoover up any tech they come across that makes them get where they think they are going faster. | Contrary to received wisdom, and however vigorously they may, as a class, declare themselves proudly prehistoric when it comes to technology, lawyers are ''not'' universal Luddites, and will hoover up any tech they come across that makes them get where they think they are going faster. | ||