Lawyer acceptance factor: Difference between revisions

Lawyer acceptance factor (view source)

237 bytes added , 4 October 2021

no edit summary

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{A|design|
 [[File:Wife appreciation factor.png|450px|thumb|center|If you want to get it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.]]
-}}In the olden days when hi fi was still a thing, spoddy gentlemen used to talk about the “wife appreciation factor” — could I get my new kit in the door without the missus hitting the roof? Generally an awesome total harmonic distortion rating won’t cut it.  It has to look ''good'' — ideally ''invisible''.
+}}In the olden days when hi fi was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — what were the winning attributes to get that new pre-amplification gain stage attenuator kit in the door without the missus hitting the roof?
+Generally, awesome total harmonic distortion rating wouldn’t cut it.  It had to ''look'' acceptably unobtrusive'' — ideally ''invisible'', but failing that with walnut veneer, a minimalist fascia and a resemblance to mid-century Danish lounge furniture would at least put you in play
 Same goes when embarking on a user change [[journey]], particularly one where the gang of redoubtable hobbits on that journey is comprised of members of the legal profession. The business case may write itself, the data granularity it promises to kick off may be overwhelming, but still  it behoves a smart middle manager to consider how the “change journey” will present itself to the [[legal eagle]]s whom you expect to go on it.