Lawyer acceptance factor: Difference between revisions

Lawyer acceptance factor (view source)

Revision as of 22:32, 4 October 2021

95 bytes added , 4 October 2021

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{A|design|
 [[File:Wife appreciation factor.png|450px|thumb|center|If you want to get it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.]]
-}}In the olden days when hi fi was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — what were the winning attributes to get that new pre-amplification gain stage attenuator kit in the door without the missus hitting the roof?
+}}In the olden days when hi-fi envy was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — the kind of attributes would see that new pre-amplification gain stage attenuator make it through the door without the missus hitting the roof.
-Generally, awesome total harmonic distortion rating wouldn’t cut it.  It had to ''look'' acceptably unobtrusive'' — ideally ''invisible'', but failing that with walnut veneer, a minimalist fascia and a resemblance to mid-century Danish lounge furniture would at least put you in play
+Generally, an awesome total harmonic distortion rating wouldn’t cut it.  It had to ''look'' nice, which meant “acceptably unobtrusive” and ideally ''invisible'', but failing that, having artfully-applied walnut veneer, a minimalist fascia and a resemblance to mid-century Danish lounge furniture would at least put you in play.
-Same goes when embarking on a user change [[journey]], particularly one where the gang of redoubtable hobbits on that journey is comprised of members of the legal profession. The business case may write itself, the data granularity it promises to kick off may be overwhelming, but still  it behoves a smart middle manager to consider how the “change journey” will present itself to the [[legal eagle]]s whom you expect to go on it.
+We mention this because the same goes, with feeling, when embarking on a user change [[journey]], particularly one where the gang of redoubtable hobbits on that journey is comprised of members of the legal profession. The business case may write itself, the data granularity it promises to kick off may be overwhelming, but still  it behoves a smart middle manager to consider how the “change journey” will present itself to the [[legal eagle]]s whom you expect to go on it.
 Because they’re a stubborn, recalcitrant lot, are our sibling lawyers.