Lawyer acceptance factor: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|design|}}When implementing any [[Change adoption|change]], and particularly one involving [[technology]], it behoves one to consider how it will present itself to the [[legal eagle]] whom you expect to use it.  
{{A|design|
[[File:Wife appreciation factor.png|450px|thumb|center|If you want to get it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.]]
}}In the olden days when hi fi was still a thing, spoddy gentlemen used to talk about the “wife appreciation factor” — could I get my new kit in the door without the missus hitting the roof? Generally an awesome total harmonic distortion rating won’t cut it.  It has to look ''good'' — ideally ''invisible''.
 
Same goes for lawyers. hen implementing any [[Change adoption|change]], and particularly one involving [[technology]], it behoves one to consider how it will present itself to the [[legal eagle]] whom you expect to use it.  


Contrary to received wisdom, and however vigorously they may, as a class, declare themselves proudly prehistoric when it comes to technology, lawyers are ''not'' universal Luddites, and will hoover up any tech they come across that makes them get where they think they are going faster.
Contrary to received wisdom, and however vigorously they may, as a class, declare themselves proudly prehistoric when it comes to technology, lawyers are ''not'' universal Luddites, and will hoover up any tech they come across that makes them get where they think they are going faster.