82,891
edits
Lawyer acceptance factor: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{image|Wife appreciation factor|png|If you want it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.}}}}{{dpn|/ˈlɔːjər əkˈsɛptəns ˈfæktə/|n|}} | {{image|Wife appreciation factor|png|If you want it in the house, consider your [[stakeholder]]s.}}}}{{dpn|/ˈlɔːjər əkˈsɛptəns ˈfæktə/|n|}} | ||
A [[UAT]] multiplier for a [[legaltech]] implementation computed by considering the ratio | A [[UAT]] multiplier for a [[legaltech]] implementation computed by considering the ratio between: | ||
(i) Features the user will want, understand and use, | |||
(ii) “Features” her management wants, understands, and expects ''her'' to use, and | |||
(iii) Things she habitually does that the [[legaltech]] will henceforth oblige her to ''not'' do, or do in a different, more effortful or perverse way. | |||
In the olden days when hi-fi envy was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — the kind of attributes that would see that new pre-amplification gain-stage attenuator make it through the door without the missus hitting the roof. | In the olden days when hi-fi envy was still a thing, spoddy anorak types would speak of the “wife appreciation factor” — the kind of attributes that would see that new pre-amplification gain-stage attenuator make it through the door without the missus hitting the roof. | ||
Generally, an awesome total harmonic distortion rating wouldn’t cut it | Generally, an awesome total harmonic distortion rating wouldn’t cut it: it had to ''look'' nice, which meant “acceptably unobtrusive” and ideally ''invisible'', but failing that, artfully-applied walnut veneer, a minimalist fascia and a resemblance to mid-century Danish lounge furniture would at least put you in play. | ||
We mention this because the same goes, with feeling, when asking experienced lawyers to embark on a “user [[change journey]]” which has in mind a destination watched over by [[legaltech]] machines of loving grace. | We mention this because the same goes, with feeling, when asking experienced lawyers to embark on a “user [[change journey]]” which has in mind a destination watched over by [[legaltech]] machines of loving grace. | ||