82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
== What the MBAs bring to the party == | == What the MBAs bring to the party == | ||
Now MBAs are not known for their imagination, but they have a long suit in reductionist analytical rigour and they do like an over-arching metaphorical schema. They see the “inhouse legal problem” may be impervious to front-on attack, but they can ''analyse'' it into submission. This they do by breaking down that intractable whole into [[Legibility|legible]], familiar parts that already exist in the MBA toolkit. Each of these components becomes its own little sub-component, with its own workstream, and workstream lead, going out and gathering evidence and, | Now MBAs are not known for their imagination, but they have a long suit in reductionist analytical rigour and they do like an over-arching metaphorical schema. They see the “inhouse legal problem” may be impervious to front-on attack, but they can ''analyse'' it into submission. This they do by breaking down that intractable whole into [[Legibility|legible]], familiar parts that already exist in the MBA toolkit. Each of these components becomes its own little sub-component, with its own workstream, and workstream lead, going out and gathering evidence and, basically, getting in the way of the lawyers who are busily trying to execute on their time-worn business model. | ||
{{Sa}} | |||
* [[Magic circle law firm]] | * [[Magic circle law firm]] | ||
* [[ISDA ninja]] | * [[ISDA ninja]] | ||
* [[Ultimate client]] | * [[Ultimate client]] |