Legally significant thing: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|entity|}}''Res legis'''; a being assigned rational agency and personal responsibility by the legal system. A person has legal personality, as does a corporat...")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|entity|}}''[[Res legis]]'''; a being assigned rational agency and personal responsibility by the legal system. A [[person]] has [[legal personality]], as does a [[corporation]] and, in ''some'' jurisdictions, a [[trust]], but a ''tree'' does not. Nor does a [[polar bear]], a portfolio of assets, a [[partnership]] or an individual [[branch]] of a corporation.
{{a|entity|}}{{d|Res legis|/reɪz ˈlɛʤɪz/|n}}
1. A being assigned rational agency and personal responsibility by the legal system. A [[person]] has [[legal personality]], as does a [[corporation]] and, in ''some'' jurisdictions, a [[trust]], but a ''tree'' does not. Nor does a [[polar bear]], a portfolio of assets, a [[partnership]] or an individual [[branch]] of a corporation.
 
2. An element having legal significance divorced from the physical substrate in which it is typically embedded. A right or obligation in the abstract, as opposed to the contract in which it is written. A [[debt]], as opposed to the [[promissory note|promissory instrument]] which represents it upon this mortal rock.
 
The JC made “res legis” up, so if you use it amongst the [[Legal eagle|cognoscenti]], do so with poise, confidence and bluster. If enough people do this, it will become a thing.


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Stakeholder]]
*[[Stakeholder]]
*[[Legal personality]]
*[[Legal personality]]