Legaltech roll of honour: Difference between revisions

Legaltech roll of honour (view source)

Revision as of 17:50, 13 January 2023

309 bytes added , 13 January 2023

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Where we see it, we have also added snarkish, superficial and no doubt thoroughly unjustified shade, in the form of emojis about the products based on their business name, website presentation and proclivity for meaningless buzzwordery.
-Sticking “lex”, “ify” or “ly” in your business name and getting some Romanian coder you found on Upwork to mocking up some basic html workflow and claiming you have revolutionised contract management is not going to cut it.
+Sticking “lex”, “ify” or “ly” in your business name and getting some [[Java coder from Bucharest you found on UpWork]] to mocking up a basic html workflow and claiming you have revolutionised contract management is not, any longer, going to cut it. If you have to be an order of magnitude better than your competition to suceed <ref>© Peter Thiel.</ref>, then the fact that your product does the same thing, and looks exactly the same, as dozens of other offerings on the market ought to tell you something. At least twenty-five firms offer basically the ''same'' contract generation and document management service. ''They will not all survive''.
-You are welcome to click on the now 300 websites we have painstakingly collated. In fact, you ''should''. It is a sobering realisation of how homogenous, quotidian, and basically ''dreary'' this sector is. There are a few outliers, but broadly the applications all do more or less the same things, with few variations. At least twenty-five firms offering basically the same contract generation and document management service. ''They are not all going to survive''.
+If you don’t believe me, you are ''welcome'' to click on the now 300 websites we have painstakingly collated. In fact, you ''should''. It is a sobering realisation of how homogenous, quotidian, and basically ''dreary'' this sector is. There are a few outliers, but broadly the applications all do more or less the same things, with few variations.
 As we get on we are planning to build the list out to feature the types of businesses these websites represent, but for now just clicking on the links will reveal a jaw-dropping amount of homogeneity. Lots of frustrated associates at across the big law universe all seem to have had the same idea. Who would have thought that legal practitioners would be so conditioned to thinking in exactly the same way as each other?
 {{sa}}