82,341
edits
Legaltech startup conference: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil| | {{a|devil| | ||
[[File:Kids say the funniest things.png|400px|thumb|center|An occasional column devoted to gems from the IT profession]] | [[File:Kids say the funniest things.png|400px|thumb|center|An occasional column devoted to gems from the IT profession]] | ||
}}We define a [[legaltech start-up conference]] as “opportunities for [[Reg tech entrepreneur|fantasists]] to meet the [[General counsel|credulous]] to flog them [[Legal tech landscape|stuff they don’t need]] with [[When budget allows|budgets they don’t have]]”. | }}===department=== | ||
{{quote|“we love automation. We love automating complex things. Our app can handle anything with its structured questions: it can add new clauses, new schedules. The complexity is mind-bending.” | |||
:Heard live on ''Legaltech entrepreneurs say the funniest things''}} | |||
We define a [[legaltech start-up conference]] as “opportunities for [[Reg tech entrepreneur|fantasists]] to meet the [[General counsel|credulous]] to flog them [[Legal tech landscape|stuff they don’t need]] with [[When budget allows|budgets they don’t have]]”. | |||
Here is an interesting list for the [[neural network]] to parse: here are the two hundred and seventy-seven (277) [[vendor]]s listed in the Legal Geek “Startup Map”<ref>I am not making this up: https://www.legalgeek.co/startup-map/. There could be more: the bamboozling way it is set out made it hard to be sure I had go them all.</ref> Now I confess, not all of these are necessarily for profit businesses (by which I mean ''intending'' to make a profit; a large portion of them, however well disposed to the ''idea'' of making a profit, won’t ''actually'' make one) — there are some, even at a quick scan, that don’t even try. And some are unique and different. But they are the great minority. Most fall into the [[legaltech landscape]] as mapped out by {{author|Alex Hamilton}}. | Here is an interesting list for the [[neural network]] to parse: here are the two hundred and seventy-seven (277) [[vendor]]s listed in the Legal Geek “Startup Map”<ref>I am not making this up: https://www.legalgeek.co/startup-map/. There could be more: the bamboozling way it is set out made it hard to be sure I had go them all.</ref> Now I confess, not all of these are necessarily for profit businesses (by which I mean ''intending'' to make a profit; a large portion of them, however well disposed to the ''idea'' of making a profit, won’t ''actually'' make one) — there are some, even at a quick scan, that don’t even try. And some are unique and different. But they are the great minority. Most fall into the [[legaltech landscape]] as mapped out by {{author|Alex Hamilton}}. | ||
| Line 325: | Line 328: | ||
*ZYNYO <br> | *ZYNYO <br> | ||
{{ref}} | |||