Legaltech startup conference: Difference between revisions

Legaltech startup conference (view source)

11 bytes removed , 11 October 2021

no edit summary

82,165

edits

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 The other view is pessimistic: there is a reason for for the the variety. As we like to say, [[tedium is particular, not generic|''tedium is particular, not generic'']].
-And, also, consider two very well-funded, sophisticated market participants who are ''perfectly positioned'' clean up in this sector, but who, despite twenty years of opportunity, haven’t: Microsoft and Google. You have to wonder whether they know something these three hundred [[legaltech]] gurus don’t.<ref></ref> Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
+And, also, consider two very well-funded, sophisticated market participants who are ''perfectly positioned'' clean up in this sector, but who, despite twenty years of opportunity, haven’t: Microsoft and Google. You have to wonder whether they know something these three hundred [[legaltech]] gurus don’t. Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
 On this view, these little firms owe their continued survival to the single, unique problem they solve for their limited range of clients. Many have one or two clients each. It stands to reason that you orient your product and develop it according to the expectations of your anchor tenant.  This same unique use case may be a barrier to acquiring that second client, whose unique conundrum does not quite match.