Legibility: Difference between revisions

337 bytes added ,  20 November 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|mgmt|}}{{d|Legibility|/ˌlɛdʒɪˈbɪlɪti/|n|}}
{{a|bi|}}{{d|Legibility|/ˌlɛdʒɪˈbɪlɪti/|n|}}
{{quote|I began to see legibility as a central problem in statecraft. The premodern state was, in many crucial respects, par­tially blind; it knew precious little about its subjects, their wealth, their land-holdings and yields, their location, their very identity. It lacked anything like a detailed “map” of its terrain and its people. It lacked, for the most part, a measure, a metric, that would allow it to “trans­late” what it knew into a common standard necessary for a synoptic view. As a result, its interventions were often crude and self-defeating.
{{quote|I began to see legibility as a central problem in statecraft. The premodern state was, in many crucial respects, par­tially blind; it knew precious little about its subjects, their wealth, their land-holdings and yields, their location, their very identity. It lacked anything like a detailed “map” of its terrain and its people. It lacked, for the most part, a measure, a metric, that would allow it to “trans­late” what it knew into a common standard necessary for a synoptic view. As a result, its interventions were often crude and self-defeating.
:—{{author|James C. Scott}}, {{br|Seeing Like a State}}}}
:—{{author|James C. Scott}}, {{br|Seeing Like a State}}}}
Line 7: Line 7:
The dynamics surrounding a given educational institution are surely unique, and complex: a function of geographical, geopolitical, sociological factors. Yet the government has no choice but to measure, compare and rate them on a simplified basis, on irregular short visits.
The dynamics surrounding a given educational institution are surely unique, and complex: a function of geographical, geopolitical, sociological factors. Yet the government has no choice but to measure, compare and rate them on a simplified basis, on irregular short visits.


Scott’s idea of the illegible relationships between people in an economy resonates with {{author|David Graeber}}’s idea<ref>{{br|Debt: The First 5,000 Years}}.</ref> of “everyday communism” — a basic social glue without which rationalist economic transactions could hardly take place.
Scott’s idea of the “illegible relationships” between people in an economy resonates with {{author|David Graeber}}’s idea<ref>{{br|Debt: The First 5,000 Years}}.</ref> of “everyday communism” — a basic social glue without which rationalist economic transactions could hardly take place, and {{author|Joe Norman}}’s observation that the [[informal]] interactions in a [[system]] are what account for 80% of its effectiveness.
 
===Busyness===
Is this the origin of the confusion with productivity with business, and facetime as a substitute for value. By definition I can see who is in the office late, and early.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Deep dive]]
*[[Deep dive]]
Line 14: Line 15:
*{{author|David Graeber}}’s {{br|Debt: The First 5,000 Years}}
*{{author|David Graeber}}’s {{br|Debt: The First 5,000 Years}}
{{c|management}}
{{c|management}}
{{ref}}