Lehman: Difference between revisions

43 bytes removed ,  2 July 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
For [[Lehman]] is a [[risk controller]]’s [[magic incantation]] — a [[hex]], a [[horcrux]], a way of killing lively debate stone dead in its tracks. For any new initiative, any pragmatic proposal to do things in a smarter way, can be derailed by oblique reference to the sad demise of [[Lehman Brothers]], however irrelevant it may be. For, as we all know, [[Chicken-licken|the sky fell in]] on {{t|Lehman}}’s head because it tried to standardize its business and create robust operational flows that didn't involve [[credit]] sitting on [[cross default]] [[escalation]]s for three weeks.
For [[Lehman]] is a [[risk controller]]’s [[magic incantation]] — a [[hex]], a [[horcrux]], a way of killing lively debate stone dead in its tracks. For any new initiative, any pragmatic proposal to do things in a smarter way, can be derailed by oblique reference to the sad demise of [[Lehman Brothers]], however irrelevant it may be. For, as we all know, [[Chicken-licken|the sky fell in]] on {{t|Lehman}}’s head because it tried to standardize its business and create robust operational flows that didn't involve [[credit]] sitting on [[cross default]] [[escalation]]s for three weeks.


Similarly, [[Magic circle law firm|counsel]] will resist any stroke of your pen against their mangled syntax on the solemn, but unelucidated, pretext that they “lived through the [[Lehman]] administration” and are so scarred by the experience<ref>Look, let’s face facts, campers: the [[Lehman]] collapse was hardly some POW chain-gang on Burma Railway for our learned friends, so hold those crocodile tears.</ref> that that record must state, in [[legal triplicate]]s, obvious truisms (like [[Time is of the essence|time being of the essence]] [[shall]] not vitiate [[applicable]] contractual [[grace period]]s — real-life example) and under no circumstances can one be as foolhardy as to countenance an appeal to the common sense or formal symbolic logic to be applied by the [[Queen’s Bench Division]] of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales.
Had only its [[credit]] team been allowed to vacillate nervously for weeks upon end about whether to waive {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} for [[Hedge fund]] clients, [[Lehman]] might still be with us today.


Had only its [[credit]] team been allowed to vacillate nervously for weeks upon end about whether to waive {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} for [[Hedge fund]] clients, [[Lehman]] might still be with us today.
Similarly, [[Magic circle law firm|counsel]] will resist any stroke of your pen against their mangled syntax on the solemn, but unelucidated, pretext that they “lived through the [[Lehman]] administration” and are so scarred by the experience<ref>Look, let’s face facts, campers: the [[Lehman]] collapse was hardly some POW chain-gang on Burma Railway for our learned friends, so hold those crocodile tears.</ref> that that record must state, in [[legal triplicate]]s, obvious truisms (like [[Time is of the essence|time being of the essence]] [[shall]] not vitiate [[applicable]] contractual [[grace period]]s — real-life example) and under no circumstances can one be as foolhardy as to countenance an appeal to the common sense or capacity for formal symbolic logic of the [[Queen’s Bench Division]].


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[MF Global]]
*[[MF Global]]
*[[Nosferatu]]
*[[Nosferatu]]
*[[Chicken Licken]]
*[[Chicken Licken]]
*[[Lehmans]]


{{egg}}
{{egg}}
{{draft}}
{{draft}}
{{c|Magic words}}
{{c|Magic words}}